Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 4:20 AM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:37 PM

The decision by Parliament to reject Prime Minister Blair's call for the extension of detention-without-charge from 14 days to 90 seems like a stunning defeat, not for the Prime Minister, but for common sense in Great Britain. Only four months removed from the atacks on the London Tube, and hours before the savage attack in Amman, Jordon, the representatives of Great Britain refused a modest request from its police and security services.

The Labor Party is to Great Britain what the Democratic Party is to the U.S. I think it is safe to assume that Democratic majorities in the House and Senate would display the same indifference to security concerns that Labor showed today in London.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:17 PM

Rep. Sue Myrick (R-N.C.)said at a press conference today:


"Our main concern is, who's in our state? I mean this is a critical issue today. I mean they just arrested down on the border, what a couple of weeks ago, three al Qaeda members who came across from Mexico into the United States. I mean that's a given fact. They were holding them in the jail down there."


Now that is a blockbuster story, or a complete urban myth. The Congresswoman's statement is on an audio file, available at Radioblogger.com (as is a transcript of my interview with The Nation's David Corn, and a caller who sided with him.)

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 4:18 PM

The best run race in SoCal, and the best tune up for marathons in the New Year, is the December 3 Southern California Half Marathon.

Join me on the course. You can be assured of not finishing last.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 4:01 PM

Michael Belay is a security guard at Chapman University. He is an immigrant from Ethiopia, and maintains very close ties with his home country.


Michael's heart has been touched by the plight of one village's orphans, and this year he sold his home in orange County, took the proceeds and travelled to the village where he used the money to build a school for the orphans. You can see pictures of the kids here.

Michael is back in the USA now, and back at work, having moved his family into an apartment. He remains the most cheerful and upbeat man in the world, who simply explains that he did what his faith and his heart compelled him to do.


This Christmas season, please consider a gift to HappyinEthiopia, which is the organization that supports the school. Donations are teax deductible.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 3:58 PM

Judith Miller "retired" from the New York Times today.


Sure she did.


Why are we supposed to believe the Times about stories to which they are not a party when the paper so boldly lies about a story the facts of which are 100% within its control?

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 3:52 PM

From Haaretz:


A number of Israelis staying on Wednesday at the Radisson hotel were evacuated before the bombing by Jordanian security forces, apparently due to a specific security alert. They were escorted back to Israel by security personnel.

The Foreign Ministry stated Wednesday that no Israeli tourists are known to have been injured in the blasts. Representatives of Israel's embassy in Amman were in contact with local authorities to examine any report of injured Israelis, but none were received. There are often a number of Israeli businessman and tourists in Amman, including in the hotels hit Wednesday.

UPDATE:

This story has been discredited and withdrawn by Haaretz.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 7:43 AM

and he doesn't like Jarhead, at all.


The Los Angeles Times sees bad news ahead for the flick.


How much money would a well-made movie honoring the soldiers, sailors, airmen, Coast Guard and Marines of the armed services haul in?


Why hasn't it been made?

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 6:19 AM

There is no such thing as a fusion candidate, no such thing as a bipartisan campaign or a non-partisan issue, and come election night,
there are just two parties, one at the GOP HQ and one at the Dem HQ. There's a winners' party and a losers' party. Last night you were
speaking to the losers' party.


I didn't go. Why bother? The polls had shown for a few days that only Prop 75 had a chance (the measure to stop public employee unions from deducting political dues from their members' paychecks without prior authroization), and besides, most of your people aren't my friends and colleagues from nearly 30 years around California politics. They are fine folks, to be sure, and I have run into them in many of the seminar rooms of the state's hundred universities, but you have now run into the reality of California politics. The folks who don't care much about politics, well, they reallydon't care much about politics. They certainly can't get you wins on their own. There aren't enough of them.


As Nixon often remarked: You can't win with just the conservatives, but you cannot win without them.


Your team told you that if you put enough bait on the hook, you'd get the troops to marching. While those that showed up no doubt dutifully voted for your four initiatives --and Prop 73, which would have required notice to parents when their teen daughter sought an abortion-- the base most certainly did not march. The collective yawn was hard to miss.


And they aren't even that upset this morning. They didn't lose a thing --you lost. Perhaps you will spend the next couple of weeks figuring out that you have exactly zero high profile GOP conservatives close to you, and that there are a whole bunch of lefties running around your offices busy advancing agendas with which the right cannot agree.

Name the conservative icon upon whom you depend and to whom you go for solid advice? There isn't one.


Name the single conservative cause with which you are associated.
Spending restraint? Private property rights? Limits on abortion? Second Amendment advocacy? Judges?

You have picked fights with all the right people, but over what? Redistricting that might have cost the GOP crucial seats in D.C., a spending cap that wasn't, teacher tenure tweaks? Again, mixing it up with the public employee unions was fine, but off-year elections aren't exactly gladiator time, especially when a messed-up budget got passed because your advisors didn't want a show-down in the summer.


Which is not to say that you won't win in 2006. You probably will, because both of the would-be Democratic candidates are stiffs with big bucks, and California remembers Gray Davis. Sending all Democrats to Sacramento is a recipe for power shortages and same sex marriage, abandonment of the public schools to failure and endless traffic congestion. A Republican governor is sort of like a fail-safe on the doomsday machine of California government. This helps you, a lot.


Plus, charisma and the technique that will get a grin and a yes vote from relentlessly bored voters who care not a whit about anything are still much in demand.

(But you must know that Rob Reiner could change things. Not Beatty --who looks more and more like Nixon every day-- but Reiner. Reiner's smart, very funny, very savvy. That would be a debate for the ages. They could sell tickets. No bobo dolls named Arianna, but a real contest.)


So you've got to get serious about winning in '06, and that means getting serious about the GOP base. Some suggestions:


1. Clear out the left from inside the "horseshoe," the Governor's offices inside the Capitol.

2. Bring in some senior advisors with pedigrees on the right and listen to them. Ask Bruce Herchensohn to spend a couple of days a week in the offices, as a "minsiter without portfolio." You don't have to do a thing he recommends, but there is no more respected figure on the California right than Bruce. Associated with Bruce, but also with Reagan, is Ken Khachigian. Ask Ken to take up a post somewhere on the battlements. And raid Hoover --get Peter Robinson to convene a three day idea-fest with the folks who haven't spent their lives trading quarter percents with Sacramento's lobbyists.


3. The press operation. Someone has persuaded you that the political press is like the Hollywood gang. But they can't be wooed that way. They can't be wooed at all. And they don't matter. They don't create the buzz anymore than they do majorities. Retool and figure out new media.


4. The 2006 slate. There are big, big problems forming here, and the downticket matters as much as the top. The initiatives in the pipeline haven't been thought through. Get a marriage amendment qualified, period. And take another swing at the unions as well. Develop and qualify an initiative that protects churches/synagogues/other worship facilities from the local planning departments. Develop and qualify an anti-Kelo intiative.


Don't just say "I'll be back." Live it.


5. Finally, don't blow the California Supreme Court appointment or the rest of your judicial appointments. I sighed when I saw the latest round of your court picks in southern California. Look. If you are going to appoint Democrats to the bench --even one--don't ask me to get excited about your re-election. I know you can't do much with a legislature that makes the Swedish parliament look conservative, but you own your judicial picks. Ask around. There are great Republican lawyers who would make great Republican judges.


On the California Supreme Court vacancy, understand that this is the biggest decision you will make between now and next November. If you blow it, it will be a sure fire message to the base that the candle isn't worth the fight. If Lockyer is against a nominee, that's a great sign of that nominee's qualifications.


I don't doubt that you are more enrgized than ever and ready for a knock-down 12 months. Your spokeman on the tube last night wasn't. (Enough of "rolling up our sleeves" already!)


It is going to be sweet to win re-election, especuially after all the doom-sayers on this Wednesday morning, but you can't get there with the tactics or the team of 2005.


I know you made some lousy movies, and you must have known at some point that the team you had on the set just wasn't cutting it.


Have you got that feeling now? You should. You're the producer and the director. Change the script. Change everything. Or go back tp making movies in 15 months.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:39 AM

The New York Times has its hands on another classified report, this one concerning the "ten techniques" of interrogation that was issued by the CIA's Inspector General John Helgerson in the "spring of 2004:"


The report, by John L. Helgerson, the C.I.A.'s inspector general, did not conclude that the techniques constituted torture, which is also prohibited under American law, the officials said. But Mr. Helgerson did find, the officials said, that the techniques appeared to constitute cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment under the convention.

Only one of the 10 techniques is specified: "waterboarding, in which a prisoner is strapped to a board and made to believe that he is drowning."


So, who gave the Times the report? Was the transfer illegal? Is this the second phase of the CIA's campaign agau=inst the Bush Administration?


Yesterday the CIA requested a Department of Justice investigation into a leak to the Washington Post of classified information regarding secret detention facilities for al Qaeda suspects held overseas. The agency should send a follow up and ask that investigation extend to this leak as well.