Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:55 AM


A Quinnipiac Poll of the Ohio electorate shows incumbent Democratic governor Ted Strickland improving his standing a bit, and holding a lead of 44% to 39% over former congressman John Kasich.

The same poll shows an approval rating for President Obama of only 44%, against a 52% disapproval rating.  Given Strickland's relative decent showing in the poll, this has to be read as an enormous battering of the president's reputation.  

Three other polls from earlier this year show John Kasich with leads of from 6 to 10 points, which suggests that Quinnipiac's sample is favorable to the Democrat Strickland.  If that is the case, imagine what the numbers for the president would look like isf the Quinnipiac sample approached that of the other polls.

Whatever his standing --terrible, or worse-than-terrible-- among Buckeye voters, it will decline even more with this Thursday's stunt summit.  The president's handlers are persuaded that the American people are as dumb as cement, and that tricks and fast talk will persuade them that Obamacare is new and improved when it is in fact only even bigger and more expensive than in December.  Every time the president pushes this or any other plan to swell government even more and increase the debt on the next generation even more obscenely, his numbers will fall, and with those numbers the future of Democrats in the House and Senate.

The Washington Post describes the president's plan in a headline as "staying on the offensive," and then in the body of the report as Obama's decision "to go big one last time."  What it really is is undeniable proof that this president is hard left to the core, indifferent to public opinion, and willing to sacrifice scores of his Democratic allies in the House and Senate to try and push through a remake of American society via its health care systems.

Michael Barone quotes on Beltway insider as suggesting the summit is really just a dance of the exit strategies.  That is not what the netroots are seeing.  They are cheering the attempt to drive the destruction of American medicine forward.

"Boehner and McConnell figured they had won. They figured wrong," declared a DailyKos poster this morning.  "[D]on't you believe the crap about health reform not being popular."

This kind of see-no-evil-polling is a road running to a political cliff.

Yesterday the WaPo's Chris Cillizza passed on the assessment of political handicapper Charlie Cook:



Political handicapper Charlie Cook said that it was "very hard to come up with a scenario where Democrats don't lose the House" in an interview with National Journal late last week.

Cook, who, in the interest of full disclosure, gave the Fix our first job in political Washington, went on to note that while House Republicans have their fair share of problems but "you could triple the Republican Party's problems and I'd still rather have their problems than the problems facing Democrats."

Cook has, of late, been extremely down on Democrats' chances -- an attitude born, he argued in the interview, of "fundamental, total miscalculations from the very, very beginning" by the White House about the direction to take the country. Cook added that the White House's miscalculations in terms of their agenda were "of proportions comparable to President George W. Bush's decision to go into Iraq."

Caution about November is the order of the day because of the vast number of events that will happen between then and now, which could include at the most dramatic end of the scale a war with Iran.

But the president's insistence on staying far to the left of the American mainstream has unleashed an enormous pushback from Americans, many millions of whom never before cared about politics.  They care now because the president and his radical allies on the Hill are threatening the basic American consensus about the size and role of government while spending at a ruinous level.  I expect this summer to see massive anti-Democrat rallies in Washington D.C., and still more massive sums contributed to the campaign coffers of principled opponents of Democratic incumbents who cooperated with Obama's attempted takeover of the health care system.  ReverseTheVote.org was just a small beginning to the political payback House and Senate Democrats are facing.  That's why Bayh got out.  It is why Byron Dorgan got out.  It is why even Chuck Schumer is praying that no serious Republican takes a flyer against him.

The president's stubborn insistence on his rejected plan and his maneuvering to push it through despite three clear referenda on it from New Jersey, Virginia and Massachusetts tells the voters everything they need to know about whether there was hope he would moderate his plans.

He won't.  The only way to stop Obamacare is to defeat scores of Democrats in the fall and to make the inevitability of that result plain right now.  
 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 4:35 PM


Michael O'Hanlon of Brookings has been a guest many times since the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq began, and now he and his co-author Hassina Sherjan of Aid Afghanistan for Education have published a new book which should be read by anyone interested in a stable, secure Afghanistan, Toughing It Out in Afghanistan.

Toughing It Out in Afghanistan
.
 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:02 AM


This is the week when Obamacare makes either its comeback or its last stand.

My Washington Examiner column suggests a couple of topics for the "summit."

But the best message to send is a contribution to either Tim Burns or William Russell, the two candidates to replace Jack Murtha in Pennsylvania's 12th Congressional District.  (One or the other will be selected by local GOP officials in the coming weeks for the May 18th special election.)

If the incumbent Democrats see a flood of money flowing to that race they will remember again the message from Massachusetts and balk at following the president, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid over the cliff.

Tim Burns' website is here.

William Russell's is here.

.


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:00 AM


The Monday morning column from Clark Judge:

Glenn Beck, George Will, Amity Shlaes, CPAC and the American Swing Voter
By Clark S. Judge, managing director, White House Writers Group, Inc. ( www.whwg.com <http://www.whwg.com>  ) and chairman, Pacific Research Institute (www.pacificresearch.org <http://www.pacificresearch.org>  )
 
It is a good gauge of the mainstream media’s cluelessness that so many of its commentators were surprised when Fox News star Glenn Beck slammed the Republican Party in his Saturday CPAC keynote address – and the CPAC audience cheered.
 
The annual conservative meeting’s attendance numbered something like ten thousand, a record.  But as of this morning the counter on the conference’s website showed over 436,000 views of live and replayed speeches. That does not include C-SPAN coverage (also replayable on line).  It is a fair bet that CPAC’s audience for major speeches topped one million.
 Read More...

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:42 AM


According to an AP report of a U.S. Senate study of the drug Avandia, the medicine caused 83,000 heart attacks from 1999 to 2007.

When I posted on this story yesterday, the scale of the potential number of claims against GlaxoSmithKline had not been revealed.

Republicans at this week's "summit" on health care ought to ask the president, Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid how the Obamacare proposals will distribute the costs of this soon-to-arrive avalanche of Avandia litigation, and how single payer addresses any aspect of the massive costs associated with mass tort litigation.


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:27 AM


Read Matt Latimer's story on how Docs4PatientCare came to be.  I have a very small role in it, but Hal Scherz and his MD and other health care professional colleagues are amazing examples of what citizen activists can accomplish.

You can join themvia Docs4PatientCare.org.


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:47 AM


The studies reported on in today's New York Times on the possible connection between Avandia and heart attacks are certain to launch thousands of lawsuits.  The opening paragraphs:



Hundreds of people taking Avandia, a controversial diabetes medicine, needlessly suffer heart attacks and heart failure each month, according to confidential government reports that recommend the drug be removed from the market.

The reports, obtained by The New York Times, say that if every diabetic now taking Avandia were instead given a similar pill named Actos, about 500 heart attacks and 300 cases of heart failure would be averted every month because Avandia can hurt the heart. Avandia, intended to treat Type 2 diabetes, is known as rosiglitazone and was linked to 304 deaths during the third quarter of 2009.



If you or a family member has been taking Avandia and suffered a heart attack, this is more than sufficient cause on which to bring a lawsuit for damages.  If death resulted for the loved one, a wrongful death suit will follow.

This is not the problem with our tort system.  People who are seriously injured ought to be able to quickly recover their losses.  As my frequent radio guest, law partner and long-time plaintiff lawyer Joseph Timothy Cook likes to point out (yes, despite my frequent editorials about tort reform, I have a partner who represents plaintiffs) everyone is for tort reform until they or their family member has been injured.  So I'll write it again: If Avandia is really the reason why a patient is injured or dies, then GlaxoSmithKline should be obliged to do the best that can be done vis-a-vis the victims.

The problems with our system --problems left completely unaddressed by Obamacare-- are the roulette-like aspects of our tort law, under which thousands of plaintiffs' lawyers are already racing to attract any and all claims from anyone who thinks they may have taken Avandia and thinks their particular problem is related to it.  There are no barriers to entry to the courts other than the willingness of some lawyer somewhere being willing to roll the dice on a contingency basis. 

Nor are there many limits on certain types of damages that are subject to wild swings in the eyes of a jury, including punitive damages.  Everything depends upon the jurisdiction in which the case is brought.

Again, advocates of tort reform do not argue that the injured should not be compensated.  They should be and the courts can be made to work fairly in such settings as mass tort.  But right now they do not do so, or at least not very often.

While this legal avalanche begins to slide and then pick up velocity, the pharmaceutical industry will be watching another disaster to its bottom line take shape, with all the consequent side effects on current and future research and development.  Costs of all drugs will have to rise to cover the costs associated with all Avandia claims, good and bad.  Diabetics will still want relief so the demand won't slacken for the medicines that will help.  Their costs will simply rise.  Every dollar paid to victims,non-victims, and the lawyers for both as well as defense counsel will get passed right back to the consumer.

As the hard left edge of the Senate Democrats debate making a run at single payor, ask yourself exactly what that will do to prevent the costs described above from rolling through the system.  The answer is nothing.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:13 AM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 11:09 AM


Hmmm. This report suggests that the left wing of the already left wing California Democratic Party isn't pleased with Jerry Brown.

Brown has been running a very disciplined campaign to date, and it is easy to suspect that this review owes more to the ideology of the writer and the audience than to an objective review of Brown's delivery.  Brown knows the only way to compete in November is to steer to the middle or even slightly to the right of it.  That sort of line just isn't going to go over well with Bay Area enviros.


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 1:31 AM


One segment with Mark Steyn on today's show (transcript here,) and an hour with Victor Davis Hanson (transcript here.)

Both are well worth reading, but you can only listen to them at The Hughniverse.  It is also the only place that you can absorb Lileks' Private Label.