Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 10:49 PM


A senior Boxer aide arrested for bringing dope into the Senate office building.

If this was a Republican senator, how much coverage would be generated and with what sort of placement?

Looking forward to the Los Angeles Times tomorrow morning.

 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:53 PM


Will the Religious Right show up even though this election cycle is almost exclusively focused on the size of government and the vast deficits that are robbing the future?
I will ask pastors to call and tell me what they think on this question.

I will be joined in studio by Biola University Professor John Mark Reynolds, author most recently, along with Phillip E. Johnson, of Against All Gods: What's Right and Wrong About the new Atheism.

Against All Gods: What's Right and Wrong About the New Atheism
 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:46 AM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:06 AM


The president's approval rating is falling and his party's prospects are dim.

The next eight weeks promise hard realities when it comes to Obamacare, including this headline from the Wall Street Journal this morning: Health Insurers Plan Hikes --Rate Increases Are Blamed on Health Care Overhaul; White House Questions Logic

Team Obama can and will "question" every bad story's connection to their policies, but voters have already connected the dots on the dismal employment picture to the growth-destroying "stimulus," and now the arrival of rate hikes and benefit cuts as fall insurance season rolls around will rightfully be tied directly to the president's and the Congressional Democrats' crazed attempt to remake the medical world in their "vision."  Obama-Pelosi-Reid own everything that goes wrong with health care at every level every day.  The country told them not to pass the monstrosity, but pass it they did.  Joe Biden's "big f------ deal" is now a lead weight around every Democrat in every race because every Democrat in every race voted either for Pelosi or Reid, and thus for the leadership that first capitulated to and then enthusiastically pressed forward with the president's nutty ideas on health care.

Beyond that grim news on health care is a stagnant economy, and the 9.6% unemployment isn't going to get anywhere near the president's promised maximum of 8% in the next two months.  Trotting out a mini-me stimulus was nuts as well:  $850 billion wasted dollars didn't do anything for the economy so why would another $50 billion on top of the $26 billion end-of-summer tip?  This is flailing.  And pointing out flailing isn't calling the president a dog.  It is calling him clueless on the economy.

The only thing that could draw capital out of hiding and revive entrepreneurial confidence and thus hiring and growth is an extension of the Bush tax cuts, but the president's ideological contempt for the most successful won't let him agree to that.  Every economist in the country could urge him to extend the cuts for two or three years but he wouldn't do it.  His inner Alinksy is snarling at the thought.

So the president has one card and only one card: class war, and he is rolling that out on schedule.  He's going to, sigh, tell us his own story --again, and again, as though his two autobiographies and endless profiles haven't been on every virtual corner since 2007.  Somehow he is going to try and persuade Americans deeply worried about their economic future given the recklessness of the past two years and the incompetence of the team driving the economic bus that all will be well because the president somehow got through private school in Hawaii, then Occidental and Columbia and two years a community organizer and then Harvard Law School. 

This attempt to be Bill Clinton and feel people's pain is from a different era, one in which information flows didn't exist and when the electorate wasn't so completely aware of what has happened and what is happening.

The president's economic plan failed.  The panic that swept him into the White House was all but over when the first stimulus passed, and it has been his absurd economic policies that have driven risk-taking and investment offshore or underground.  Our key competitors are growing but we are stuck in a parallel universe of mountainous debt and a maniacal desire to punish the rich.

The GOP should absolutely refuse the president's half-a-loaf tax cuts and the class war rhetoric that will accompany the debate.  Insistence on extension of all the cuts, including for the highest income bracket, is about creating jobs which won't happen if the key job makers at the top of the income scale are saving up against not just the tax hike but also the burdens of Obamacare and all the other "initiatives" launched by the anti-capitalist White House.

The GOP's refrain should be simple:  Why would voters trust the architects of the stimulus and Obamcare to lead on tax rates and economic recovery?  Aren't two enormous strikes enough?

MSM will try and mount one last charge on behalf of the incompetent president they inflicted on the country, and denunciations of Republican obstructionism will be fast and furious over the next two months, but Leaders McConnell and Boehner have to keep their members on the same page, all saying:  "We know what the president and Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid have promised, and we know what they have delivered.  We are putting a choice to the people:  Do you want more of them, or do you want to try growth and freedom instead?"


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:59 AM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 6:46 PM


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 5:54 PM


I screened the extraordinary new movie Waiting for Superman today --it arrives in theaters on September 24-- and will begin the show with Washington Post education writer Jay Mathews, who is featured in the film and whose book, Work Hard, Be Nice is in my view the essential companion to the movie and to any serious discussion of education reform.

Waiting for Superman

You cannot be at all acquainted with the state of American public education and not know that the NEA and AFT have failed not just students but the teachers they purport to represent.  See the movie, read Jay's book, but especially vote for every Republican at every level especially if you are a parent of a child in or soon to attend a public school or a classroom teacher.  As the movie makes unmistakably clear, he NEA et al are leading teachers and their families over a cliff, and only true reformers can save the system before the public declares game over.

Work Hard. Be Nice.: How Two Inspired Teachers Created the Most Promising Schools in America
 

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:35 AM


My Washington Examiner column this morning looks at the growing divide between the interests of young classroom teachers and their older and retired counterparts.

As November approaches, young teachers have to be looking at the perilous state of public finance at the federal and especially the state levels and wondering how their union bosses can be standing with House Democrats or trying to elect Jerry Brown in California or Ted Strickland in Ohio or any Democrat anywhere.  Education spending depends upon healthy, growing economies, and places like California and Ohio are teetering on the brink of massive cuts in the governmental sector because the money's just not there and new taxes simply cannot be added on to an already crushing business burden.

If public education is going to be saved and reformed and the careers of young classroom professionals preserved, reformers like Meg Whitman and John Kasich have to be given a chance to pare away government's excesses outside of education so that the schools can survive and thrive.  Younger education professionals have to break with their union seniors who are playing for a couple of years here and there and hoping to be retired with a guaranteed pension before the roof falls in.  What they don't seem to realize is that those retirement benefits are only as good as the state economy that supports them.  You cannot get blood from a stone.

I am going to limit most of my program today to calls from teachers.  I am curious how many of them have figured out that their union leadership has driven them right to the edge of a cliff, and whether they intend to vote for real change this time. 

The math teachers at least should get it.


 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 9:25 AM


You can waste a lot of time here.  Keep in mind that Dems need a lot more cash than Republicans, if only to airbrush the president and Nancy Pelosi out of all their candidates' pictures and websites.

Dan Balz and Jon Cohen report on the deteriorating Dem prospects in this morning's WaPo, as does Mike Allen in Politico.com, who uses the "t" word --"tsunami."

All the incumbent Democrats have going their way is cash and a volunteer network. Here are ten races where you can help close the cash divide for the GOP challenger.

And by clicking on the Winning in November banner above, you can join the virtual network of activists that will be making calls, sending emails and walking precincts in key districts between now and 11/2.  

 
Posted by: Hugh Hewitt at 8:50 AM


Hard to believe in 2010 that many candidate websites are still lacking crucial appeals, are slow to load, or difficult to maneuver.

Nor should they be expensive.  If you are planning a race or even if you are already in one and your website is not doing the job, visit ElectionEnergy.com out of Minnesota.

When I try and find a candidate to book for an interview and discover their website has no phone number or text contact, that is when I suspect I am dealing with a new media strategy put together by a brother-in-law.


 
« Previous12345678910951952Next »